Review



rabbit anti human cd8  (Bioss)


Bioz Verified Symbol Bioss is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Bioss manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    Bioss rabbit anti human cd8
    Rabbit Anti Human Cd8, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 14 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti human cd8/product/Bioss
    Average 93 stars, based on 14 article reviews
    rabbit anti human cd8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    93
    Bioss rabbit anti human cd8
    Rabbit Anti Human Cd8, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti human cd8/product/Bioss
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti human cd8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Servicebio Inc rabbit anti-human cd8 antibody gb15068
    Rabbit Anti Human Cd8 Antibody Gb15068, supplied by Servicebio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti-human cd8 antibody gb15068/product/Servicebio Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti-human cd8 antibody gb15068 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti human cd8 rabbit pab
    Anti Human Cd8 Rabbit Pab, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti human cd8 rabbit pab/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti human cd8 rabbit pab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Servicebio Inc rabbit polyclonal anti-cd8 antibody for human samples
    Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Cd8 Antibody For Human Samples, supplied by Servicebio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit polyclonal anti-cd8 antibody for human samples/product/Servicebio Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit polyclonal anti-cd8 antibody for human samples - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti human mouse cd8
    ( A ) UMAP plot for the different subclusters of <t>CD8</t> + T cells in human HCC tissues. ( B ) UMAP plots show marker genes in different CD8 + T clusters. ( C ) Heatmap shows cell markers in each CD8 + T subtype. ( D ) Volcano plot for differential expression analysis of T EX and T EFF clusters. P adj , adjusted P value; n.s., not significant. ( E ) Venn plot for differential genes between T EX and T EFF clusters in three scRNA-seq datasets and one bulk RNA-seq dataset. ( F ) Dot plot shows specific function markers enriched in different CD8 + T subclusters in Zhongshan cohort. ( G ) UMAP plot for the different subclusters of CD8 + T cells in GSE149614 dataset. T CM , central memory T cells. ( H ) Relative expression of HMGB2 in CD8 + T cells at different tumor stages. ( I ) Relative expression of HMGB2 in CD8 + T cells in the normal liver tissues and tumor tissues. ( J ) UMAP plot for the different subclusters of CD8 + T cells in GSE140228 dataset. ( K ) UMAP plot shows the expression of HMGB2 in different CD8 + T cell subclusters. ( L ) Relative expression of HMGB2 in CD8 + T cells in the normal liver tissues and tumor tissues. ( M ) UMAP plot for the different subclusters of CD8 + T cells in mouse HCC tissues. ( N ) UMAP plot shows Hmgb2 expression of CD8 + T cells in mouse HCC tissues. ( O ) Dot plot shows specific function markers enriched in CD8 + T subclusters of mouse HCC tissues. Wilcoxon test.
    Anti Human Mouse Cd8, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti human mouse cd8/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti human mouse cd8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti human cd8
    ( A ) UMAP plot for the different subclusters of <t>CD8</t> + T cells in human HCC tissues. ( B ) UMAP plots show marker genes in different CD8 + T clusters. ( C ) Heatmap shows cell markers in each CD8 + T subtype. ( D ) Volcano plot for differential expression analysis of T EX and T EFF clusters. P adj , adjusted P value; n.s., not significant. ( E ) Venn plot for differential genes between T EX and T EFF clusters in three scRNA-seq datasets and one bulk RNA-seq dataset. ( F ) Dot plot shows specific function markers enriched in different CD8 + T subclusters in Zhongshan cohort. ( G ) UMAP plot for the different subclusters of CD8 + T cells in GSE149614 dataset. T CM , central memory T cells. ( H ) Relative expression of HMGB2 in CD8 + T cells at different tumor stages. ( I ) Relative expression of HMGB2 in CD8 + T cells in the normal liver tissues and tumor tissues. ( J ) UMAP plot for the different subclusters of CD8 + T cells in GSE140228 dataset. ( K ) UMAP plot shows the expression of HMGB2 in different CD8 + T cell subclusters. ( L ) Relative expression of HMGB2 in CD8 + T cells in the normal liver tissues and tumor tissues. ( M ) UMAP plot for the different subclusters of CD8 + T cells in mouse HCC tissues. ( N ) UMAP plot shows Hmgb2 expression of CD8 + T cells in mouse HCC tissues. ( O ) Dot plot shows specific function markers enriched in CD8 + T subclusters of mouse HCC tissues. Wilcoxon test.
    Anti Human Cd8, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti human cd8/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti human cd8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Proteintech rabbit anti human cd8
    The Sd/Gv-based CAR effectively redirected T cells to eliminate target cells. A Schematic representation of the design of modular CAR by Sd/Gv platform. Sd: SDCatcher, Gv: GVoptiTag. B and C Coomassie blue staining and western blotting analysis of Gv-VRC01 scFv and Gv-CD5-CD30 scFvs. Anti-His antibody was used to confirm the expression and purity of each protein. D The Sd-28BBZ3-P2A-tCD19 elements were transduced into HEK293T cells, and the expression of CD19 indirectly indicated the expression of Sd-28BBZ3. Meanwhile, Gv-scFvs (VRC01 scFv or CD5-CD30 scFvs) were expressed as fusion proteins with a 6-Histidine tag. The cells expressing Sd-28BBZ3-P2A-tCD19 were incubated with Gv-scFv proteins, allowing for indirect detection of Gv-scFV binding to Sd on the cell surface through the presence of His tag. Immunofluorescence staining analysis of His-tagged Gv-scFv proteins conjugating to Sd-28BBZ3-P2A-tCD19 on HEK293T cells with anti-CD19 (red) and anti-His (green) antibodies. DAPI was used to stain the nuclei (blue). Scale bars represented 10 μm. E The Sd-28BBZ3-P2A-tCD19 elements were transduced into HEK293T cells. After 12 h, the culture medium was removed and the cells were cultured with fresh medium supplemented with 100 nM Gv-scFVs (VRC01 scFv or CD5-CD30 scFvs) proteins. Following an additional 12 h, the membrane proteins were extracted and the covalent binding of Sd-Gv was detected using western blot with anti-Gv/Sd antibodies. F and G Direct killing of target cell lines was performed utilizing the Cyto-Tox nonradioactive cytotoxicity kit with Jurkat gp160 ( F ) or Karpas 299 ( G ) cells as targets. The effector cells included the following cells. Control <t>CD8</t> + T: CD8 + T cells transduced with empty vector. Sd-28BBZ3 CD8 + T: CD8 + T cells transduced with Sd-28BBZ3. Sd-28BBZ3 + Gv-scFv: CD8 + T cells transduced with Sd-28BBZ3 and incubated with proteins of Gv-scFvs (VRC01 scFv or CD5-CD30 scFvs). VRC01-CAR: CD8 + T cells transduced with conventional VRC01-CAR. CD5-CD30-CAR: CD8 + T cells transduced with conventional CD5-CD30-CAR. Different ratios of effector cells and target cells were co-incubated. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 3 independent biological replicates. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01
    Rabbit Anti Human Cd8, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti human cd8/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti human cd8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Biocare Medical rabbit anti-human cd8 sp16 1:100
    The Sd/Gv-based CAR effectively redirected T cells to eliminate target cells. A Schematic representation of the design of modular CAR by Sd/Gv platform. Sd: SDCatcher, Gv: GVoptiTag. B and C Coomassie blue staining and western blotting analysis of Gv-VRC01 scFv and Gv-CD5-CD30 scFvs. Anti-His antibody was used to confirm the expression and purity of each protein. D The Sd-28BBZ3-P2A-tCD19 elements were transduced into HEK293T cells, and the expression of CD19 indirectly indicated the expression of Sd-28BBZ3. Meanwhile, Gv-scFvs (VRC01 scFv or CD5-CD30 scFvs) were expressed as fusion proteins with a 6-Histidine tag. The cells expressing Sd-28BBZ3-P2A-tCD19 were incubated with Gv-scFv proteins, allowing for indirect detection of Gv-scFV binding to Sd on the cell surface through the presence of His tag. Immunofluorescence staining analysis of His-tagged Gv-scFv proteins conjugating to Sd-28BBZ3-P2A-tCD19 on HEK293T cells with anti-CD19 (red) and anti-His (green) antibodies. DAPI was used to stain the nuclei (blue). Scale bars represented 10 μm. E The Sd-28BBZ3-P2A-tCD19 elements were transduced into HEK293T cells. After 12 h, the culture medium was removed and the cells were cultured with fresh medium supplemented with 100 nM Gv-scFVs (VRC01 scFv or CD5-CD30 scFvs) proteins. Following an additional 12 h, the membrane proteins were extracted and the covalent binding of Sd-Gv was detected using western blot with anti-Gv/Sd antibodies. F and G Direct killing of target cell lines was performed utilizing the Cyto-Tox nonradioactive cytotoxicity kit with Jurkat gp160 ( F ) or Karpas 299 ( G ) cells as targets. The effector cells included the following cells. Control <t>CD8</t> + T: CD8 + T cells transduced with empty vector. Sd-28BBZ3 CD8 + T: CD8 + T cells transduced with Sd-28BBZ3. Sd-28BBZ3 + Gv-scFv: CD8 + T cells transduced with Sd-28BBZ3 and incubated with proteins of Gv-scFvs (VRC01 scFv or CD5-CD30 scFvs). VRC01-CAR: CD8 + T cells transduced with conventional VRC01-CAR. CD5-CD30-CAR: CD8 + T cells transduced with conventional CD5-CD30-CAR. Different ratios of effector cells and target cells were co-incubated. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 3 independent biological replicates. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01
    Rabbit Anti Human Cd8 Sp16 1:100, supplied by Biocare Medical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti-human cd8 sp16 1:100/product/Biocare Medical
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti-human cd8 sp16 1:100 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    ( A ) UMAP plot for the different subclusters of CD8 + T cells in human HCC tissues. ( B ) UMAP plots show marker genes in different CD8 + T clusters. ( C ) Heatmap shows cell markers in each CD8 + T subtype. ( D ) Volcano plot for differential expression analysis of T EX and T EFF clusters. P adj , adjusted P value; n.s., not significant. ( E ) Venn plot for differential genes between T EX and T EFF clusters in three scRNA-seq datasets and one bulk RNA-seq dataset. ( F ) Dot plot shows specific function markers enriched in different CD8 + T subclusters in Zhongshan cohort. ( G ) UMAP plot for the different subclusters of CD8 + T cells in GSE149614 dataset. T CM , central memory T cells. ( H ) Relative expression of HMGB2 in CD8 + T cells at different tumor stages. ( I ) Relative expression of HMGB2 in CD8 + T cells in the normal liver tissues and tumor tissues. ( J ) UMAP plot for the different subclusters of CD8 + T cells in GSE140228 dataset. ( K ) UMAP plot shows the expression of HMGB2 in different CD8 + T cell subclusters. ( L ) Relative expression of HMGB2 in CD8 + T cells in the normal liver tissues and tumor tissues. ( M ) UMAP plot for the different subclusters of CD8 + T cells in mouse HCC tissues. ( N ) UMAP plot shows Hmgb2 expression of CD8 + T cells in mouse HCC tissues. ( O ) Dot plot shows specific function markers enriched in CD8 + T subclusters of mouse HCC tissues. Wilcoxon test.

    Journal: Science Advances

    Article Title: Targeting HMGB2 acts as dual immunomodulator by bolstering CD8 + T cell function and inhibiting tumor growth in hepatocellular carcinoma

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ads8597

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) UMAP plot for the different subclusters of CD8 + T cells in human HCC tissues. ( B ) UMAP plots show marker genes in different CD8 + T clusters. ( C ) Heatmap shows cell markers in each CD8 + T subtype. ( D ) Volcano plot for differential expression analysis of T EX and T EFF clusters. P adj , adjusted P value; n.s., not significant. ( E ) Venn plot for differential genes between T EX and T EFF clusters in three scRNA-seq datasets and one bulk RNA-seq dataset. ( F ) Dot plot shows specific function markers enriched in different CD8 + T subclusters in Zhongshan cohort. ( G ) UMAP plot for the different subclusters of CD8 + T cells in GSE149614 dataset. T CM , central memory T cells. ( H ) Relative expression of HMGB2 in CD8 + T cells at different tumor stages. ( I ) Relative expression of HMGB2 in CD8 + T cells in the normal liver tissues and tumor tissues. ( J ) UMAP plot for the different subclusters of CD8 + T cells in GSE140228 dataset. ( K ) UMAP plot shows the expression of HMGB2 in different CD8 + T cell subclusters. ( L ) Relative expression of HMGB2 in CD8 + T cells in the normal liver tissues and tumor tissues. ( M ) UMAP plot for the different subclusters of CD8 + T cells in mouse HCC tissues. ( N ) UMAP plot shows Hmgb2 expression of CD8 + T cells in mouse HCC tissues. ( O ) Dot plot shows specific function markers enriched in CD8 + T subclusters of mouse HCC tissues. Wilcoxon test.

    Article Snippet: Anti-human/mouse CD8 , 85336 , Cell Signaling Technology, USA.

    Techniques: Marker, Quantitative Proteomics, RNA Sequencing, Expressing

    ( A ) Gene Ontology (GO) analysis reveals changes in Hmgb2 -cKO CD8 + T cells. FDR, false discovery rate. ( B ) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) shows top pathway enriched in Hmgb2 -cKO CD8 + T cells. ( C ) mRNA levels of electron transport chain genes in NC and Hmgb2 -cKO CD8 + T cells. ( D ) Heatmap for energy metabolites in isolated NC and Hmgb2 -cKO CD8 + T cells detected by liquid chromatography–MS (LC-MS) analysis. cAMP, adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate; GTP, guanosine 5′-triphosphate; NAD, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NADH, reduced form of NAD + ; NADPH, reduced form of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; CoA, coenzyme A; AMP, adenosine 5′-monophosphate; UDP, uridine 5′-diphosphate; ADP, adenosine 5′-diphosphate; GDP, guanosine diphosphate; NADP, beta-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphoric acid. ( E ) Intensity of ATP, NAD + , and fumaric acid as in (D) ( n = 3). ( F ) KEGG analysis shows top metabolic pathway changes as in (D). ( G ) Seahorse extracellular flux analysis of OCR in isolated NC and Hmgb2 -cKO CD8 + T cells. FCCP, carbonyl cyanide p -trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone. ( H ) Quantification of OCR as in (G) ( n = 32). ( I ) Immunofluorescence micrographs of NC and Hmgb2 -cKO OT-I CD8 + T cells stained with MitoTracker (red) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (blue) after coculture with Hepa1-6–OVA cells. Scale bar, 10 μm. ( J ) Comparison of fluorescence of stained MitoTracker as in (I) ( n = 5). ( K ) Transmission electron microscope images of mitochondria in activated NC and Hmgb2 -cKO OT-I CD8 + T cells after coculture with Hepa1-6–OVA cells. The density of mitochondrial cristae is compared ( n = 7). ( L ) Flow cytometry analysis of CD44 hi CD62L lo effector CD8 + T cells in NC and Hmgb2 -cKO OT-I CD8 + T cells after coculture with Hepa1-6–OVA cells ( n = 4). ( M ) Flow cytometry analysis of GranB + IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells as in (L). ( N ) Flow cytometry analysis of TNF-α + CD8 + T cells as in (L). ( O ) Flow cytometry analysis of PD1 + LAG-3 + CD8 + T cells as in (L). Data are presented as the means ± SEM. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. Student’s t test for (C), (E), and (J) to (O). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test for (H).

    Journal: Science Advances

    Article Title: Targeting HMGB2 acts as dual immunomodulator by bolstering CD8 + T cell function and inhibiting tumor growth in hepatocellular carcinoma

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ads8597

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Gene Ontology (GO) analysis reveals changes in Hmgb2 -cKO CD8 + T cells. FDR, false discovery rate. ( B ) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) shows top pathway enriched in Hmgb2 -cKO CD8 + T cells. ( C ) mRNA levels of electron transport chain genes in NC and Hmgb2 -cKO CD8 + T cells. ( D ) Heatmap for energy metabolites in isolated NC and Hmgb2 -cKO CD8 + T cells detected by liquid chromatography–MS (LC-MS) analysis. cAMP, adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate; GTP, guanosine 5′-triphosphate; NAD, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NADH, reduced form of NAD + ; NADPH, reduced form of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; CoA, coenzyme A; AMP, adenosine 5′-monophosphate; UDP, uridine 5′-diphosphate; ADP, adenosine 5′-diphosphate; GDP, guanosine diphosphate; NADP, beta-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphoric acid. ( E ) Intensity of ATP, NAD + , and fumaric acid as in (D) ( n = 3). ( F ) KEGG analysis shows top metabolic pathway changes as in (D). ( G ) Seahorse extracellular flux analysis of OCR in isolated NC and Hmgb2 -cKO CD8 + T cells. FCCP, carbonyl cyanide p -trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone. ( H ) Quantification of OCR as in (G) ( n = 32). ( I ) Immunofluorescence micrographs of NC and Hmgb2 -cKO OT-I CD8 + T cells stained with MitoTracker (red) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (blue) after coculture with Hepa1-6–OVA cells. Scale bar, 10 μm. ( J ) Comparison of fluorescence of stained MitoTracker as in (I) ( n = 5). ( K ) Transmission electron microscope images of mitochondria in activated NC and Hmgb2 -cKO OT-I CD8 + T cells after coculture with Hepa1-6–OVA cells. The density of mitochondrial cristae is compared ( n = 7). ( L ) Flow cytometry analysis of CD44 hi CD62L lo effector CD8 + T cells in NC and Hmgb2 -cKO OT-I CD8 + T cells after coculture with Hepa1-6–OVA cells ( n = 4). ( M ) Flow cytometry analysis of GranB + IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells as in (L). ( N ) Flow cytometry analysis of TNF-α + CD8 + T cells as in (L). ( O ) Flow cytometry analysis of PD1 + LAG-3 + CD8 + T cells as in (L). Data are presented as the means ± SEM. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. Student’s t test for (C), (E), and (J) to (O). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test for (H).

    Article Snippet: Anti-human/mouse CD8 , 85336 , Cell Signaling Technology, USA.

    Techniques: Isolation, Liquid Chromatography, Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectroscopy, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Comparison, Fluorescence, Transmission Assay, Microscopy, Flow Cytometry

    ( A ) Location of differential accessible ATAC-seq peaks in NC and Hmgb2 -cKO CD8 + T cells. 3′UTR, 3′ untranslated region; 5′UTR, 5′ untranslated region. ( B ) Chromatin accessibility changes of genes associated with effector function and mitochondrial transcription factors. ( C ) The correlation between Hmgb2 , Tfam , and Tfb1m expression in CD8 + T cells from murine scRNA-seq data. ( D ) mRNA levels of Keap1 and Nfe2l2 in NC and Hmgb2 -cKO CD8 + T cells ( n = 6). ( E ) mRNA levels of ARE genes in NC and Hmgb2 -cKO CD8 + T cells ( n = 3). ( F ) Protein changes of KEAP1 and NRF2 after Hmgb2 knockout. ( G ) The ubiquitination of NRF2 after Hmgb2 knockout. IB, immunoblot. ( H ) Protein changes of KEAP1 and NRF2 after stimulation of mouse recombinant HMGB2 protein and IN-1. NC CD8 + T cells were treated with recombinant HMGB2 protein (500 ng/ml) and/or IN-1 (10 μM) for 48 hours. ( I ) The ubiquitination of NRF2 after cell treatment as in (H). ( J ) Immunofluorescence staining of spontaneous HCC tissues in NC and Hmgb2 -cKO mice. NRF2 + KEAP1 − CD8 + T cells were labeled. Scale bars, 20 μm (left) and 10 μm (right). HP, high power field. ( K ) Seahorse extracellular flux analysis of OCR in different CD8 + T cell groups ( n = 6 to 8) after cell treatment as in (H). ( L ) Quantification of seahorse extracellular flux analysis of OCR of different CD8 + T cells as in (K). Data are presented as the means ± SEM. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. Pearson test for (C) Student’s t test for (D), (E), and (J). Two-way ANOVA test for (L).

    Journal: Science Advances

    Article Title: Targeting HMGB2 acts as dual immunomodulator by bolstering CD8 + T cell function and inhibiting tumor growth in hepatocellular carcinoma

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ads8597

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Location of differential accessible ATAC-seq peaks in NC and Hmgb2 -cKO CD8 + T cells. 3′UTR, 3′ untranslated region; 5′UTR, 5′ untranslated region. ( B ) Chromatin accessibility changes of genes associated with effector function and mitochondrial transcription factors. ( C ) The correlation between Hmgb2 , Tfam , and Tfb1m expression in CD8 + T cells from murine scRNA-seq data. ( D ) mRNA levels of Keap1 and Nfe2l2 in NC and Hmgb2 -cKO CD8 + T cells ( n = 6). ( E ) mRNA levels of ARE genes in NC and Hmgb2 -cKO CD8 + T cells ( n = 3). ( F ) Protein changes of KEAP1 and NRF2 after Hmgb2 knockout. ( G ) The ubiquitination of NRF2 after Hmgb2 knockout. IB, immunoblot. ( H ) Protein changes of KEAP1 and NRF2 after stimulation of mouse recombinant HMGB2 protein and IN-1. NC CD8 + T cells were treated with recombinant HMGB2 protein (500 ng/ml) and/or IN-1 (10 μM) for 48 hours. ( I ) The ubiquitination of NRF2 after cell treatment as in (H). ( J ) Immunofluorescence staining of spontaneous HCC tissues in NC and Hmgb2 -cKO mice. NRF2 + KEAP1 − CD8 + T cells were labeled. Scale bars, 20 μm (left) and 10 μm (right). HP, high power field. ( K ) Seahorse extracellular flux analysis of OCR in different CD8 + T cell groups ( n = 6 to 8) after cell treatment as in (H). ( L ) Quantification of seahorse extracellular flux analysis of OCR of different CD8 + T cells as in (K). Data are presented as the means ± SEM. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. Pearson test for (C) Student’s t test for (D), (E), and (J). Two-way ANOVA test for (L).

    Article Snippet: Anti-human/mouse CD8 , 85336 , Cell Signaling Technology, USA.

    Techniques: Expressing, Knock-Out, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Western Blot, Recombinant, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Labeling

    ( A ) UMAP plot for the different subclusters of CD8 + T cells in human HCC tissues scheduled to neoadjuvant anti–PD-1 monotherapy. ( B ) Histogram plot shows the proportions of CD8 + T cells as in (A). ( C ) UMAP plot for the HMGB2 expression of CD8 + T cells in nonresponse and PR HCC tissues. ( D ) Relative expression of HMGB2 in CD8 + T cells as in (C). ( E ) Comparison of HMGB2 expression in CD8 + T cells in pretreatment and postoperative tissues. ( F ) The schematic diagram shows the medication regimen in vivo. ( G ) Representative images of HCC spontaneous models in different treatment groups. Scale bar, 1 cm. ( H ) Tumor numbers of HCC spontaneous models as in (G). ( I ) Survival time of HCC spontaneous models as in (G). ( J ) Flow cytometry of intratumoral IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells and GranB + CD8 + T cells from spontaneous HCC tissues. ( K ) Quantification of intratumoral IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells ( n = 5). ( L ) Quantification of intratumoral GranB + CD8 + T cells ( n = 5). ( M ) Immunofluorescence staining of effector markers in spontaneous HCC tissues as in (G). Scale bar, 50 μm. Data are presented as the means ± SEM. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. Wilcoxon test for (D) and (E). One-way ANOVA test for (H), (K), and (L). The icon in (F) is cited from BioRender: W. Qu (2025; https://BioRender.com/m63n001 ).

    Journal: Science Advances

    Article Title: Targeting HMGB2 acts as dual immunomodulator by bolstering CD8 + T cell function and inhibiting tumor growth in hepatocellular carcinoma

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ads8597

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) UMAP plot for the different subclusters of CD8 + T cells in human HCC tissues scheduled to neoadjuvant anti–PD-1 monotherapy. ( B ) Histogram plot shows the proportions of CD8 + T cells as in (A). ( C ) UMAP plot for the HMGB2 expression of CD8 + T cells in nonresponse and PR HCC tissues. ( D ) Relative expression of HMGB2 in CD8 + T cells as in (C). ( E ) Comparison of HMGB2 expression in CD8 + T cells in pretreatment and postoperative tissues. ( F ) The schematic diagram shows the medication regimen in vivo. ( G ) Representative images of HCC spontaneous models in different treatment groups. Scale bar, 1 cm. ( H ) Tumor numbers of HCC spontaneous models as in (G). ( I ) Survival time of HCC spontaneous models as in (G). ( J ) Flow cytometry of intratumoral IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells and GranB + CD8 + T cells from spontaneous HCC tissues. ( K ) Quantification of intratumoral IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells ( n = 5). ( L ) Quantification of intratumoral GranB + CD8 + T cells ( n = 5). ( M ) Immunofluorescence staining of effector markers in spontaneous HCC tissues as in (G). Scale bar, 50 μm. Data are presented as the means ± SEM. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. Wilcoxon test for (D) and (E). One-way ANOVA test for (H), (K), and (L). The icon in (F) is cited from BioRender: W. Qu (2025; https://BioRender.com/m63n001 ).

    Article Snippet: Anti-human/mouse CD8 , 85336 , Cell Signaling Technology, USA.

    Techniques: Expressing, Comparison, In Vivo, Flow Cytometry, Immunofluorescence, Staining

    ( A ) Representative images of harvested Hepa1-6 subcutaneous HCC tumors. Scale bar, 1 cm ( B ) Tumor growth curves of Hepa1-6 subcutaneous tumors in BALB/C nude mice and C57BL/6J mice. ( C ) Tumor weights of subcutaneous Hepa1-6 tumors in BALB/C nude mice and C57BL/6J mice ( n = 6). ( D ) Difference of tumor volumes between shCtrl and shHmgb2 subcutaneous tumors in BALB/C nude mice and C57BL/6J mice ( n = 6). ( E ) Differential GO pathways in Hepa1-6 shHmgb2 cells. JAK, Janus kinase. ( F ) GSEA analysis shows top pathway enriched in Hepa1-6 shHmgb2 cells. ( G ) Western blotting experiment shows STAT1 pathway changes in Hepa1-6 cells and Huh7 cells. Cells were treated with IFN-γ (10 ng/ml) or fludarabine (10 μM) for 24 hours. ( H ) Annexin V apoptosis analysis for Hepa1-6 cells treated with vehicle and IFN-γ (10 or 20 ng/ml). PI, propidium iodide. ( I ) Quantification for proportions of apoptotic cells after treatment of IFN-γ. ( J ) T cell killing assay with Hepa1-6 shCtrl and shHmgb2 cells and wild-type (WT) CD8 + T cells ( n = 5). RLU, relative light unit. ( K ) Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining and quantification of Hepa1-6 subcutaneous tumors ( n = 4). Scale bar, 25 μm. HPF, high power field. ( L ) Representative immunohistochemistry images of CD8, IFN-γ, and CXCL10 staining in Hepa1-6 subcutaneous tumors. Scale bars, 20 μm. ( M ) Quantification of CD8, IFN-γ, and CXCL10 staining in Hepa1-6 subcutaneous tumors ( n = 4). Data are presented as the means ± SEM. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. Two-way ANOVA test for (B) Student’s t test for (C), (D), (I), (J), (K), and (M).

    Journal: Science Advances

    Article Title: Targeting HMGB2 acts as dual immunomodulator by bolstering CD8 + T cell function and inhibiting tumor growth in hepatocellular carcinoma

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ads8597

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Representative images of harvested Hepa1-6 subcutaneous HCC tumors. Scale bar, 1 cm ( B ) Tumor growth curves of Hepa1-6 subcutaneous tumors in BALB/C nude mice and C57BL/6J mice. ( C ) Tumor weights of subcutaneous Hepa1-6 tumors in BALB/C nude mice and C57BL/6J mice ( n = 6). ( D ) Difference of tumor volumes between shCtrl and shHmgb2 subcutaneous tumors in BALB/C nude mice and C57BL/6J mice ( n = 6). ( E ) Differential GO pathways in Hepa1-6 shHmgb2 cells. JAK, Janus kinase. ( F ) GSEA analysis shows top pathway enriched in Hepa1-6 shHmgb2 cells. ( G ) Western blotting experiment shows STAT1 pathway changes in Hepa1-6 cells and Huh7 cells. Cells were treated with IFN-γ (10 ng/ml) or fludarabine (10 μM) for 24 hours. ( H ) Annexin V apoptosis analysis for Hepa1-6 cells treated with vehicle and IFN-γ (10 or 20 ng/ml). PI, propidium iodide. ( I ) Quantification for proportions of apoptotic cells after treatment of IFN-γ. ( J ) T cell killing assay with Hepa1-6 shCtrl and shHmgb2 cells and wild-type (WT) CD8 + T cells ( n = 5). RLU, relative light unit. ( K ) Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining and quantification of Hepa1-6 subcutaneous tumors ( n = 4). Scale bar, 25 μm. HPF, high power field. ( L ) Representative immunohistochemistry images of CD8, IFN-γ, and CXCL10 staining in Hepa1-6 subcutaneous tumors. Scale bars, 20 μm. ( M ) Quantification of CD8, IFN-γ, and CXCL10 staining in Hepa1-6 subcutaneous tumors ( n = 4). Data are presented as the means ± SEM. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. Two-way ANOVA test for (B) Student’s t test for (C), (D), (I), (J), (K), and (M).

    Article Snippet: Anti-human/mouse CD8 , 85336 , Cell Signaling Technology, USA.

    Techniques: Western Blot, End Labeling, TUNEL Assay, Staining, Immunohistochemistry

    ( A ) ChIP assay shows the interaction of HMGB2 with Stat1 chromatin ( n = 3). ( B ) Colocalization of HMGB2, STAT1 and TRIM 24 in HCC subcutaneous tumor tissue. Scale bar, 10 μm. ( C ) CoIP assay shows the interaction of HMGB2 and TRIM24. ( D ) ChIP-PCR shows that TRIM24 modulates the transcriptional level of Stat1 ( n = 3). ( E ) Luciferase reporter assay shows that the Trim24 / Hmgb2 signal modulates the transcriptional level of Stat1 ( n = 3). OE, overexpression. ( F ) Representative images of the orthotopic HCC models. ( G ) Tumor weights of different groups from the orthotopic HCC models ( n = 6). ( H ) Overall survival of different treatment groups from the orthotopic HCC models. ( I ) Flow cytometry of intratumoral CD3 + CD8 + T cells as in (G). ( J ) Flow cytometry of intratumoral effector markers as in (G). ( K ) Quantification of intratumoral IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells and GranB + CD8 + T cells in different treatment groups ( n = 5). Data are presented as the means ± SEM. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. Student’s t test for (A) and (D). One-way ANOVA test for (E), (G), and (K).

    Journal: Science Advances

    Article Title: Targeting HMGB2 acts as dual immunomodulator by bolstering CD8 + T cell function and inhibiting tumor growth in hepatocellular carcinoma

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ads8597

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) ChIP assay shows the interaction of HMGB2 with Stat1 chromatin ( n = 3). ( B ) Colocalization of HMGB2, STAT1 and TRIM 24 in HCC subcutaneous tumor tissue. Scale bar, 10 μm. ( C ) CoIP assay shows the interaction of HMGB2 and TRIM24. ( D ) ChIP-PCR shows that TRIM24 modulates the transcriptional level of Stat1 ( n = 3). ( E ) Luciferase reporter assay shows that the Trim24 / Hmgb2 signal modulates the transcriptional level of Stat1 ( n = 3). OE, overexpression. ( F ) Representative images of the orthotopic HCC models. ( G ) Tumor weights of different groups from the orthotopic HCC models ( n = 6). ( H ) Overall survival of different treatment groups from the orthotopic HCC models. ( I ) Flow cytometry of intratumoral CD3 + CD8 + T cells as in (G). ( J ) Flow cytometry of intratumoral effector markers as in (G). ( K ) Quantification of intratumoral IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells and GranB + CD8 + T cells in different treatment groups ( n = 5). Data are presented as the means ± SEM. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. Student’s t test for (A) and (D). One-way ANOVA test for (E), (G), and (K).

    Article Snippet: Anti-human/mouse CD8 , 85336 , Cell Signaling Technology, USA.

    Techniques: Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Luciferase, Reporter Assay, Over Expression, Flow Cytometry

    ( A ) Proliferative inhibition curve for tannic acid on Hepa1-6 cells. IC 50 = 21.23 μM. ( B ) Representative images of orthotopic HCC models. ( C ) Tumor volumes of different groups from the orthotopic HCC model ( n = 6). ( D ) Representative images of colorectal subcutaneous tumors constructed by MC38 cell injection ( n = 6). ( E ) Tumor growth curves of subcutaneous tumors constructed by MC38 cell injection ( n = 6). ( F ) Immunohistochemistry staining images of CD8 in the subcutaneous tumors constructed by MC38 cell injection. Scale bar, 50 μm. ( G ) Representative images of spontaneous HCC model. ( H ) Tumor weights of different treatment groups in the spontaneous HCC model ( n = 6). ( I ) Overall survival of different treatment groups in the spontaneous HCC model ( n = 6). ( J ) Flow cytometry and quantification of intratumoral CD3 + CD8 + T cells as in (H). ( K ) Quantification of flow cytometry analysis on intratumoral effector CD8 + T cells and exhausted CD8 + T cells as in (H). Data are presented as the means ± SEM. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. One-way ANOVA test for (C), (H), (J), and (K). Two-way ANOVA test for (E).

    Journal: Science Advances

    Article Title: Targeting HMGB2 acts as dual immunomodulator by bolstering CD8 + T cell function and inhibiting tumor growth in hepatocellular carcinoma

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ads8597

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Proliferative inhibition curve for tannic acid on Hepa1-6 cells. IC 50 = 21.23 μM. ( B ) Representative images of orthotopic HCC models. ( C ) Tumor volumes of different groups from the orthotopic HCC model ( n = 6). ( D ) Representative images of colorectal subcutaneous tumors constructed by MC38 cell injection ( n = 6). ( E ) Tumor growth curves of subcutaneous tumors constructed by MC38 cell injection ( n = 6). ( F ) Immunohistochemistry staining images of CD8 in the subcutaneous tumors constructed by MC38 cell injection. Scale bar, 50 μm. ( G ) Representative images of spontaneous HCC model. ( H ) Tumor weights of different treatment groups in the spontaneous HCC model ( n = 6). ( I ) Overall survival of different treatment groups in the spontaneous HCC model ( n = 6). ( J ) Flow cytometry and quantification of intratumoral CD3 + CD8 + T cells as in (H). ( K ) Quantification of flow cytometry analysis on intratumoral effector CD8 + T cells and exhausted CD8 + T cells as in (H). Data are presented as the means ± SEM. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. One-way ANOVA test for (C), (H), (J), and (K). Two-way ANOVA test for (E).

    Article Snippet: Anti-human/mouse CD8 , 85336 , Cell Signaling Technology, USA.

    Techniques: Inhibition, Construct, Injection, Immunohistochemistry, Staining, Flow Cytometry

    Markers and article numbers of antibodies. PE, phycoerythrin; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; APC, antigen-presenting cell; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; mAb, monoclonal antibody.

    Journal: Science Advances

    Article Title: Targeting HMGB2 acts as dual immunomodulator by bolstering CD8 + T cell function and inhibiting tumor growth in hepatocellular carcinoma

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ads8597

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Markers and article numbers of antibodies. PE, phycoerythrin; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; APC, antigen-presenting cell; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; mAb, monoclonal antibody.

    Article Snippet: Anti-human/mouse CD8 , 85336 , Cell Signaling Technology, USA.

    Techniques: Ubiquitin Proteomics, Purification, In Vivo

    The Sd/Gv-based CAR effectively redirected T cells to eliminate target cells. A Schematic representation of the design of modular CAR by Sd/Gv platform. Sd: SDCatcher, Gv: GVoptiTag. B and C Coomassie blue staining and western blotting analysis of Gv-VRC01 scFv and Gv-CD5-CD30 scFvs. Anti-His antibody was used to confirm the expression and purity of each protein. D The Sd-28BBZ3-P2A-tCD19 elements were transduced into HEK293T cells, and the expression of CD19 indirectly indicated the expression of Sd-28BBZ3. Meanwhile, Gv-scFvs (VRC01 scFv or CD5-CD30 scFvs) were expressed as fusion proteins with a 6-Histidine tag. The cells expressing Sd-28BBZ3-P2A-tCD19 were incubated with Gv-scFv proteins, allowing for indirect detection of Gv-scFV binding to Sd on the cell surface through the presence of His tag. Immunofluorescence staining analysis of His-tagged Gv-scFv proteins conjugating to Sd-28BBZ3-P2A-tCD19 on HEK293T cells with anti-CD19 (red) and anti-His (green) antibodies. DAPI was used to stain the nuclei (blue). Scale bars represented 10 μm. E The Sd-28BBZ3-P2A-tCD19 elements were transduced into HEK293T cells. After 12 h, the culture medium was removed and the cells were cultured with fresh medium supplemented with 100 nM Gv-scFVs (VRC01 scFv or CD5-CD30 scFvs) proteins. Following an additional 12 h, the membrane proteins were extracted and the covalent binding of Sd-Gv was detected using western blot with anti-Gv/Sd antibodies. F and G Direct killing of target cell lines was performed utilizing the Cyto-Tox nonradioactive cytotoxicity kit with Jurkat gp160 ( F ) or Karpas 299 ( G ) cells as targets. The effector cells included the following cells. Control CD8 + T: CD8 + T cells transduced with empty vector. Sd-28BBZ3 CD8 + T: CD8 + T cells transduced with Sd-28BBZ3. Sd-28BBZ3 + Gv-scFv: CD8 + T cells transduced with Sd-28BBZ3 and incubated with proteins of Gv-scFvs (VRC01 scFv or CD5-CD30 scFvs). VRC01-CAR: CD8 + T cells transduced with conventional VRC01-CAR. CD5-CD30-CAR: CD8 + T cells transduced with conventional CD5-CD30-CAR. Different ratios of effector cells and target cells were co-incubated. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 3 independent biological replicates. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01

    Journal: Molecular Cancer

    Article Title: The construction of modular universal chimeric antigen receptor T (MU-CAR-T) cells by covalent linkage of allogeneic T cells and various antibody fragments

    doi: 10.1186/s12943-024-01938-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The Sd/Gv-based CAR effectively redirected T cells to eliminate target cells. A Schematic representation of the design of modular CAR by Sd/Gv platform. Sd: SDCatcher, Gv: GVoptiTag. B and C Coomassie blue staining and western blotting analysis of Gv-VRC01 scFv and Gv-CD5-CD30 scFvs. Anti-His antibody was used to confirm the expression and purity of each protein. D The Sd-28BBZ3-P2A-tCD19 elements were transduced into HEK293T cells, and the expression of CD19 indirectly indicated the expression of Sd-28BBZ3. Meanwhile, Gv-scFvs (VRC01 scFv or CD5-CD30 scFvs) were expressed as fusion proteins with a 6-Histidine tag. The cells expressing Sd-28BBZ3-P2A-tCD19 were incubated with Gv-scFv proteins, allowing for indirect detection of Gv-scFV binding to Sd on the cell surface through the presence of His tag. Immunofluorescence staining analysis of His-tagged Gv-scFv proteins conjugating to Sd-28BBZ3-P2A-tCD19 on HEK293T cells with anti-CD19 (red) and anti-His (green) antibodies. DAPI was used to stain the nuclei (blue). Scale bars represented 10 μm. E The Sd-28BBZ3-P2A-tCD19 elements were transduced into HEK293T cells. After 12 h, the culture medium was removed and the cells were cultured with fresh medium supplemented with 100 nM Gv-scFVs (VRC01 scFv or CD5-CD30 scFvs) proteins. Following an additional 12 h, the membrane proteins were extracted and the covalent binding of Sd-Gv was detected using western blot with anti-Gv/Sd antibodies. F and G Direct killing of target cell lines was performed utilizing the Cyto-Tox nonradioactive cytotoxicity kit with Jurkat gp160 ( F ) or Karpas 299 ( G ) cells as targets. The effector cells included the following cells. Control CD8 + T: CD8 + T cells transduced with empty vector. Sd-28BBZ3 CD8 + T: CD8 + T cells transduced with Sd-28BBZ3. Sd-28BBZ3 + Gv-scFv: CD8 + T cells transduced with Sd-28BBZ3 and incubated with proteins of Gv-scFvs (VRC01 scFv or CD5-CD30 scFvs). VRC01-CAR: CD8 + T cells transduced with conventional VRC01-CAR. CD5-CD30-CAR: CD8 + T cells transduced with conventional CD5-CD30-CAR. Different ratios of effector cells and target cells were co-incubated. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 3 independent biological replicates. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01

    Article Snippet: The nonspecific binding site was blocked with BSA for 30 minutes at room temperature, and then samples were incubated overnight at 4 °C with rabbit anti-human CD8, IFN-γ and Granzyme B (Proteintech, USA) antibodies at a dilution of 1:200 respectively.

    Techniques: Staining, Western Blot, Expressing, Incubation, Binding Assay, Immunofluorescence, Cell Culture, Membrane, Control, Transduction, Plasmid Preparation

    CRISPR/Cas9-mediated TCR and HLA-I knockout did not affect the function of T cells and reduced alloreactivity. A The expression of CD5-CD30-CAR on non-disrupted and TCR − /HLA-I − CD8 + T cells. tCD19 was in-frame expressed with CD5-CD30-CAR to indicate the expression of CAR molecules. B The killing results of Karpas 299 target cells under different effector/target ratios. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 3 independent biological replicates. C CD5-CD30-CAR-transduced CD8 + T cells derived from non-disrupted and TCR − /HLA-I − cells were co-cultured with Karpas 299 at a ratio of 4:1 respectively. IFN-γ secretion within each group was analyzed by ELISPOT assay. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 3 independent biological replicates. D and E The inhibition of alloreactivity upon TCR/HLA-I disruption was determined utilizing the IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. Allogenic PBMCs were co-cultured with irradiated gene-edited T cells ( D ). Irradiated allogenic PBMCs were also co-cultured with gene-edited T cells ( E ). Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 7 independent biological replicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t -test. **** p < 0.0001

    Journal: Molecular Cancer

    Article Title: The construction of modular universal chimeric antigen receptor T (MU-CAR-T) cells by covalent linkage of allogeneic T cells and various antibody fragments

    doi: 10.1186/s12943-024-01938-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: CRISPR/Cas9-mediated TCR and HLA-I knockout did not affect the function of T cells and reduced alloreactivity. A The expression of CD5-CD30-CAR on non-disrupted and TCR − /HLA-I − CD8 + T cells. tCD19 was in-frame expressed with CD5-CD30-CAR to indicate the expression of CAR molecules. B The killing results of Karpas 299 target cells under different effector/target ratios. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 3 independent biological replicates. C CD5-CD30-CAR-transduced CD8 + T cells derived from non-disrupted and TCR − /HLA-I − cells were co-cultured with Karpas 299 at a ratio of 4:1 respectively. IFN-γ secretion within each group was analyzed by ELISPOT assay. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 3 independent biological replicates. D and E The inhibition of alloreactivity upon TCR/HLA-I disruption was determined utilizing the IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. Allogenic PBMCs were co-cultured with irradiated gene-edited T cells ( D ). Irradiated allogenic PBMCs were also co-cultured with gene-edited T cells ( E ). Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 7 independent biological replicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t -test. **** p < 0.0001

    Article Snippet: The nonspecific binding site was blocked with BSA for 30 minutes at room temperature, and then samples were incubated overnight at 4 °C with rabbit anti-human CD8, IFN-γ and Granzyme B (Proteintech, USA) antibodies at a dilution of 1:200 respectively.

    Techniques: CRISPR, Knock-Out, Expressing, Derivative Assay, Cell Culture, Enzyme-linked Immunospot, Inhibition, Disruption, Irradiation

    Candidate T cells were screened and obtained utilizing modified culture conditions. A Phenotypic analysis of T cells was performed based on the expression of CD45RA, CCR7, CD122 and CD95 after exposure to either IL-2 or a combination of IL-7 and IL-15. The percentage of T SCM (CD45RA + CCR7 + CD122 + CD95 + ) cells was shown. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 9 independent biological replicates. B T cells which were induced by either IL-2 or the combination of IL-7 and IL-15 were mixed with Karpas 299 target cells to conduct the cytotoxicity assay. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 3 independent biological replicates. C Expansion of CD8 + T cells derived from 20 healthy donors within OptiVitro T-SFM medium containing IL-7 and IL-15. D and E The viability and expansion of five dominant CD8 + T cells, along with one suboptimal CD8 + T cells, following cryopreservation and thawing cycles. F and G TCR − /HLA-I − CD8 + T cells derived from five dominant donors were transduced with CD5-CD30 CAR and incubated with Karpas 299 cells for 18 to 24 h. IFN-γ secretion within each group was analyzed utilizing ELISPOT assays. Data in ( A ) were analyzed by Student’s t -test. Data in ( B ) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. Data in ( G ) were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.00

    Journal: Molecular Cancer

    Article Title: The construction of modular universal chimeric antigen receptor T (MU-CAR-T) cells by covalent linkage of allogeneic T cells and various antibody fragments

    doi: 10.1186/s12943-024-01938-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Candidate T cells were screened and obtained utilizing modified culture conditions. A Phenotypic analysis of T cells was performed based on the expression of CD45RA, CCR7, CD122 and CD95 after exposure to either IL-2 or a combination of IL-7 and IL-15. The percentage of T SCM (CD45RA + CCR7 + CD122 + CD95 + ) cells was shown. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 9 independent biological replicates. B T cells which were induced by either IL-2 or the combination of IL-7 and IL-15 were mixed with Karpas 299 target cells to conduct the cytotoxicity assay. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 3 independent biological replicates. C Expansion of CD8 + T cells derived from 20 healthy donors within OptiVitro T-SFM medium containing IL-7 and IL-15. D and E The viability and expansion of five dominant CD8 + T cells, along with one suboptimal CD8 + T cells, following cryopreservation and thawing cycles. F and G TCR − /HLA-I − CD8 + T cells derived from five dominant donors were transduced with CD5-CD30 CAR and incubated with Karpas 299 cells for 18 to 24 h. IFN-γ secretion within each group was analyzed utilizing ELISPOT assays. Data in ( A ) were analyzed by Student’s t -test. Data in ( B ) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. Data in ( G ) were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.00

    Article Snippet: The nonspecific binding site was blocked with BSA for 30 minutes at room temperature, and then samples were incubated overnight at 4 °C with rabbit anti-human CD8, IFN-γ and Granzyme B (Proteintech, USA) antibodies at a dilution of 1:200 respectively.

    Techniques: Modification, Expressing, Cytotoxicity Assay, Derivative Assay, Transduction, Incubation, Enzyme-linked Immunospot

    Generation and functional validation of MU-CAR-T cells. A Flowchart illustrating the protocol for generating MU-CAR-T cells. Briefly, α-CD3/α-CD28-activated CD8 + T cells were electroporated with Cas9 mRNA and sgRNAs targeting B2M and TRAC on Day 3 and Day 4. On Day 6, TCR − /HLA-I − T cells were enriched. Then, enriched T cells were transduced with SdΔN17-28BBZ3-tCD19 through lentiviral infection on Day 7. CD19-positive selection was performed on Day 9. After incubation with the specific Gv-scFv, the resulting products were identified as MU-CAR-T cells. B and C The cytotoxicity of MU-CAR-T cells against Jurkat gp160 and Karpas 299 target cells was observed upon being conjugated with VRC01 scFv ( B ) and CD5-CD30 scFvs ( C ) respectively. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 3 independent biological replicates. D Control CD8 + T, SdΔN17-28BBZ3-expressing CD8 + T, conventional CAR-T and MU-CAR-T cells were co-cultured with target cells at a 4:1 ratio respectively. IFN-γ secretion was detected utilizing ELISPOT assay. PHA-stimulated effector cells were treated as the positive control (PC), and effector cells-only group was treated as the negative control (NC). Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 3 independent biological replicates. ( E , F and G ) The production of cytokines including Granzyme B ( E ), IFN-γ ( F ) and TNFα ( G ) was assessed upon co-culturing of control CD8 + T cells and CAR-T cells with different target cells at the ratio of 4:1. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 3 independent biological replicates. Data in ( B ) and ( C ) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Data in ( D - G ) were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001

    Journal: Molecular Cancer

    Article Title: The construction of modular universal chimeric antigen receptor T (MU-CAR-T) cells by covalent linkage of allogeneic T cells and various antibody fragments

    doi: 10.1186/s12943-024-01938-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Generation and functional validation of MU-CAR-T cells. A Flowchart illustrating the protocol for generating MU-CAR-T cells. Briefly, α-CD3/α-CD28-activated CD8 + T cells were electroporated with Cas9 mRNA and sgRNAs targeting B2M and TRAC on Day 3 and Day 4. On Day 6, TCR − /HLA-I − T cells were enriched. Then, enriched T cells were transduced with SdΔN17-28BBZ3-tCD19 through lentiviral infection on Day 7. CD19-positive selection was performed on Day 9. After incubation with the specific Gv-scFv, the resulting products were identified as MU-CAR-T cells. B and C The cytotoxicity of MU-CAR-T cells against Jurkat gp160 and Karpas 299 target cells was observed upon being conjugated with VRC01 scFv ( B ) and CD5-CD30 scFvs ( C ) respectively. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 3 independent biological replicates. D Control CD8 + T, SdΔN17-28BBZ3-expressing CD8 + T, conventional CAR-T and MU-CAR-T cells were co-cultured with target cells at a 4:1 ratio respectively. IFN-γ secretion was detected utilizing ELISPOT assay. PHA-stimulated effector cells were treated as the positive control (PC), and effector cells-only group was treated as the negative control (NC). Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 3 independent biological replicates. ( E , F and G ) The production of cytokines including Granzyme B ( E ), IFN-γ ( F ) and TNFα ( G ) was assessed upon co-culturing of control CD8 + T cells and CAR-T cells with different target cells at the ratio of 4:1. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 3 independent biological replicates. Data in ( B ) and ( C ) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Data in ( D - G ) were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001

    Article Snippet: The nonspecific binding site was blocked with BSA for 30 minutes at room temperature, and then samples were incubated overnight at 4 °C with rabbit anti-human CD8, IFN-γ and Granzyme B (Proteintech, USA) antibodies at a dilution of 1:200 respectively.

    Techniques: Functional Assay, Biomarker Discovery, Transduction, Infection, Selection, Incubation, Control, Expressing, Cell Culture, Enzyme-linked Immunospot, Positive Control, Negative Control

    MU-CAR-T cells efficiently suppressed HIV-1 rebound after the withdrawal of antiviral treatment in vitro. A Flow chart of the experimental design. PHA-activated CD4 + T cells were infected with wild-type HIV-1 NL4 − 3 . On Day 6, inhibitory drugs including AZT and Lopinavir were added to inhibit viral replication. On Day 14, anti-HIV-1 drugs were withdrawn, and infected CD4 + T cells were co-cultured with various groups of T cells including control CD8 + T cells, SdΔN17-28BBZ3-expressing CD8 + T cells, conventional CAR-T and VRC01-MU-CAR-T cells. On Day 26, infected CD4 + T cells were harvested to detect viral RNAs. HIV-1 p24 proteins within the supernatant were monitored every 2 days. B The expression of activation markers including CD25 and HLA-DR was analyzed on unstimulated and activated CD4 + T cells, as well as CD4 + T cells on Day 14 post infection. The percentage of cells was indicated in each quadrant. C Culture supernatants were tested for the presence of p24 utilizing ELISA assay every 2 days, which represented the expression and rebound of HIV-1. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 3 independent biological replicates. D Cells from each group were harvested on Day 26, and cell-associated HIV-1 RNAs were quantified utilizing real-time RT-qPCR. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 3 independent biological replicates. Data in ( C ) were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Data in ( D ) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. **** p < 0.0001

    Journal: Molecular Cancer

    Article Title: The construction of modular universal chimeric antigen receptor T (MU-CAR-T) cells by covalent linkage of allogeneic T cells and various antibody fragments

    doi: 10.1186/s12943-024-01938-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: MU-CAR-T cells efficiently suppressed HIV-1 rebound after the withdrawal of antiviral treatment in vitro. A Flow chart of the experimental design. PHA-activated CD4 + T cells were infected with wild-type HIV-1 NL4 − 3 . On Day 6, inhibitory drugs including AZT and Lopinavir were added to inhibit viral replication. On Day 14, anti-HIV-1 drugs were withdrawn, and infected CD4 + T cells were co-cultured with various groups of T cells including control CD8 + T cells, SdΔN17-28BBZ3-expressing CD8 + T cells, conventional CAR-T and VRC01-MU-CAR-T cells. On Day 26, infected CD4 + T cells were harvested to detect viral RNAs. HIV-1 p24 proteins within the supernatant were monitored every 2 days. B The expression of activation markers including CD25 and HLA-DR was analyzed on unstimulated and activated CD4 + T cells, as well as CD4 + T cells on Day 14 post infection. The percentage of cells was indicated in each quadrant. C Culture supernatants were tested for the presence of p24 utilizing ELISA assay every 2 days, which represented the expression and rebound of HIV-1. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 3 independent biological replicates. D Cells from each group were harvested on Day 26, and cell-associated HIV-1 RNAs were quantified utilizing real-time RT-qPCR. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 3 independent biological replicates. Data in ( C ) were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Data in ( D ) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. **** p < 0.0001

    Article Snippet: The nonspecific binding site was blocked with BSA for 30 minutes at room temperature, and then samples were incubated overnight at 4 °C with rabbit anti-human CD8, IFN-γ and Granzyme B (Proteintech, USA) antibodies at a dilution of 1:200 respectively.

    Techniques: In Vitro, Infection, Cell Culture, Control, Expressing, Activation Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR

    The effectiveness of MU-CAR-T cells within tumor-bearing mice in vivo . A Flow chart of the experimental design. NCG mice were subcutaneously injected with Karpas 299 lymphoma cells. On Day 9, when the tumor volume reached approximately 100 mm 3 , control CD8 + T, SdΔN17-28BBZ3-expressing CD8 + T, conventional CAR-T and CD5-CD30-MU-CAR-T cells were intravenously injected into mice respectively, followed by the intraperitoneal injection of IL-7 and IL-15 every 3 days. On Day 24, mice were euthanized and their tumors were collected for subsequent experiments. B Mice from each group were monitored for tumor growth every 3 days. These mice were euthanized at two weeks after infusion of CAR-T cells, and their tumors were collected. Scale bar represented 10 mm. C , D , and E ) Mononuclear cells were isolated from collected tumors. Subsequently, the proportion of infiltrating T cells ( C ) as well as their capabilities of Granzyme B ( D ) and IFN-γ (E) secretion were evaluated utilizing flow cytometry analysis. F IHC staining results of CD8 + T cells, Granzyme B cytotoxic molecules and IFN-γ cytokines were acquired within tumors derived from various groups. Scale bars represented 50 μm. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 5 independent biological replicates. Data in ( B ) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Data in ( C - E ) were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001

    Journal: Molecular Cancer

    Article Title: The construction of modular universal chimeric antigen receptor T (MU-CAR-T) cells by covalent linkage of allogeneic T cells and various antibody fragments

    doi: 10.1186/s12943-024-01938-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The effectiveness of MU-CAR-T cells within tumor-bearing mice in vivo . A Flow chart of the experimental design. NCG mice were subcutaneously injected with Karpas 299 lymphoma cells. On Day 9, when the tumor volume reached approximately 100 mm 3 , control CD8 + T, SdΔN17-28BBZ3-expressing CD8 + T, conventional CAR-T and CD5-CD30-MU-CAR-T cells were intravenously injected into mice respectively, followed by the intraperitoneal injection of IL-7 and IL-15 every 3 days. On Day 24, mice were euthanized and their tumors were collected for subsequent experiments. B Mice from each group were monitored for tumor growth every 3 days. These mice were euthanized at two weeks after infusion of CAR-T cells, and their tumors were collected. Scale bar represented 10 mm. C , D , and E ) Mononuclear cells were isolated from collected tumors. Subsequently, the proportion of infiltrating T cells ( C ) as well as their capabilities of Granzyme B ( D ) and IFN-γ (E) secretion were evaluated utilizing flow cytometry analysis. F IHC staining results of CD8 + T cells, Granzyme B cytotoxic molecules and IFN-γ cytokines were acquired within tumors derived from various groups. Scale bars represented 50 μm. Data represented as mean ± SD. N = 5 independent biological replicates. Data in ( B ) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Data in ( C - E ) were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001

    Article Snippet: The nonspecific binding site was blocked with BSA for 30 minutes at room temperature, and then samples were incubated overnight at 4 °C with rabbit anti-human CD8, IFN-γ and Granzyme B (Proteintech, USA) antibodies at a dilution of 1:200 respectively.

    Techniques: In Vivo, Injection, Control, Expressing, Isolation, Flow Cytometry, Immunohistochemistry, Derivative Assay